Architects SEO Services: What Is Actually Included, and What Gets Billed Extra
The scope conversation is the one most practices skip, and it is the one that causes every argument in month six. Proposals for architects seo services tend to list disciplines rather than deliverables, which sounds thorough and commits to nothing. Technical SEO, on page optimisation, content, link building. Four phrases, no quantities, no sequence.
What follows is a breakdown of what sits inside a normal architecture retainer, what usually sits outside it, and where the arguments tend to start. Not a template to copy, more a way of reading the proposal in front of you.
Portfolio and Project Page Work
This is the core of architecture SEO and should never be an add on.
Inside a standard retainer you should expect work on your completed project pages: headings that name the project type and location, descriptive image information covering materials and context, compressed galleries that do not destroy load times, and schema markup identifying the kind of firm behind the work. Big Hunt Digital treats each completed project as a page capable of ranking for its own search terms, which only becomes true once those pieces exist.
What tends to sit outside: writing the project narratives themselves. Most agencies will structure and optimise what you give them. Few will interview your project architect and write the story from scratch unless you have agreed that separately.
Worth establishing how many project pages are covered in the first quarter, and what happens with the rest.
Technical Work on the Site Itself
Here is where the overlap with general SEO services is largest, because crawl health and site speed work much the same whether you are an architecture practice or a wholesaler.
Standard inclusions are crawl error fixes, index cleanup for thin or duplicate pages, internal linking, Core Web Vitals work at code level rather than just image compression, mobile performance, and a backlink review that flags anything toxic. Architecture sites typically need the speed work badly, since renders and high resolution photography are heavy by nature.
The line that moves is development. An agency will usually identify and often implement fixes on a standard CMS. If your site is a custom build, or if fixing something properly means rebuilding a template, that becomes a development job with its own cost. Settle who does that work, and out of whose budget, before you sign.
Local and Regional Visibility
Usually included: Google Business Profile upkeep, citation consistency so your name and address match everywhere, and location pages for the markets you genuinely work in. Note the word genuinely. Twenty city pages for places you have never built in is a liability, not a strategy.
For a sense of pace, a structural engineering campaign run by the same team reached top three local pack positions across 18 target cities within six months.
Review generation almost always falls outside. Someone has to actually ask past clients to leave them, and that is your side of the table.
See also: Advancing Careers Through Lifelong Learning
Authority and Outside Mentions
The vaguest line in most proposals, and worth pressing hardest on.
For architecture, the version that counts is coverage in design publications like Dezeen and ArchDaily, award submissions turned into something citable on your own site, and links from contractors, developers, and trade associations you already work with. That is outreach work, it is slow, and a retainer usually covers a certain volume of effort rather than a guaranteed number of placements.
Two things are usually extra. Award entry fees, which are yours. And any paid placement, which you should know about explicitly rather than discover later in a backlink report.
If an agency quotes a fixed number of links per month at a low price, find out where they come from. Volume and authority are not the same purchase.
AI Visibility
Three years ago this was not on anyone’s scope sheet. Now it belongs on yours.
The work covers structuring content so AI systems can extract clear answers, schema and entity clarity so models associate your firm with the right category, and checking that crawlers like GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended are actually permitted to read your site. Plenty of portfolio sites block them without anyone intending to.
Monitoring is where scope varies most. Tracking how often you get cited across ChatGPT, Gemini, and AI Overviews is a real ongoing cost, and some agencies include a basic version while others price it separately. Big Hunt reports most clients see initial movement in citation tracking within 60 to 90 days, and states openly that nobody can guarantee a placement inside a specific AI answer since those systems change constantly.
Find out whether citation tracking is included, how often it runs, and what you actually get to see.
Reporting, and the Bit That Is Always Yours
Reporting should be included, and it should be more useful than a rankings table. What you want is enquiries split by project type, budget band, and source. A page can perform beautifully for a search like “what does a basement extension cost per square metre” and produce no briefs whatsoever, because the people reading it are still two years from commissioning anyone.
One thing never transfers, whatever you pay. Responding to enquiries quickly. The best campaign in the world sends you a lead on a Friday afternoon, and if nobody replies until Wednesday, that brief has gone to whoever answered first.
Extension Architecture has worked with the same team since 2016 and now sits at 11.6K organic traffic, a 31 authority score, 8K organic keywords and 1.5K referring domains. Its principal Eugene Kim puts the value plainly: “As search evolved, he also helped us strengthen our visibility across AI-powered search, keeping us ahead of the competition.”
Before your next agency call, write down which of the six areas above matter most to your practice this year. Then ask each agency to tell you, specifically, which of them their fee covers and which it does not.
The ones who answer directly are usually the ones worth hiring.
